Category: Resources

5 Reasons to Search Orphan’s Court Records Even If Your Ancestor Left a Will

Are you familiar with estate records in Pennsylvania?  Yes? Then you know that there are two basic types of probates—testate, those who left a last will & testament, and intestate, those who didn’t.

Some counties store all the documents pertaining to a particular estate in one file. This is very helpful to the researcher. Request the probate file—or locate it online—and you’ve got all the pertinent documentation.

But other counties recorded the documents in separate books. For the testate, the will, inventory, and account were recorded. For the intestate, the administration bond for the administrators, inventory, account, and quite likely Orphan’s Court entries can be found. But to get the documentation, you need to look in multiple locations.

If your ancestor left a will, would you look in the Orphan’s Court records? No? Here are five reasons why you should check the Orphan’s Court records even if your ancestor left a will.

Guardianship

By far the most well known purpose of the Orphan’s Court—as the name implies—was to appoint guardians over the estates of the minor children of the deceased. Anyone under the age of majority was required to have a guardian until they came of age to administer their estate.

Children over the age of fourteen could request a specific person be appointed as their guardian. You will often see young women ask that their husbands be appointed for them. The Court appointed the guardian for those children under the age of fourteen, but those children could request a different guardian once they were fourteen years-old. Those appointed as guardians were usually relatives or persons of significance in the community.

One thing to remember is that the guardian very often was not the custodian of the child. A parent usually maintained physical custody of the child/children until they came of age. The guardian was legally responsible to administer the child’s estate, i.e. their right to property or money from the deceased’s real or personal estate.

Administration Accounts

The executors and administrators of a decedent’s estate were required by law to file an account of their administration of the estate with the Register of Will’s office within one year or as requested by the Court. These accounts were recorded in the Orphan’s Court’s books when those overseeing the estate came into court. Often these entries only mention that the account was approved and name the amount of money to be distributed or debts to be paid.

Sometimes however, the record actually includes the names of those to whom any balance on the estate was paid out and exactly how much money they received. In the case of a testate, the amounts were determined by the last will and testament; in the case of an intestate, the amounts were determined by the inheritance laws. Usually this meant that the balance was divided into equal shares, after the widow’s third was deducted, with the eldest son receiving two shares and the other heirs receiving one share.

Land partition

When an intestate died owning land, the heirs petitioned the court for an inquest of partition. The court would appoint men to assess and value the property and determine whether or not it could be divided among the heirs without “prejudice to or spoiling the whole.”

In most cases, the land could not be divided, and thus the court would grant the land to the heir who accepted it at its valuation and agreed to pay the other heirs. In the event that none of the heirs took the land, the court often granted a writ of sale, allowing the administrators to sell the land.  The proceeds would then be distributed among the heirs.

If your ancestor left a will, but died owning land which had not been accounted for in the document, the process for determining who would get that property was the same as if there were no will. The heirs went into the Orphan’s Court and petitioned for an inquest of partition for that specific tract of land. Once the inquest and valuation were returned to the Court, it would either assign ownership or issue a writ of sale.

No named executor

In most cases, the will named those the decedent choose as executor to administer their estate. However, I have seen cases where no executor was named in the will. I have also seen cases where the will was not accepted by the Register of Wills. In those cases, the estate was treated as if the decedent died intestate and administrators were appointed, an administration bond issued, and letters granted to them even though there was a will.

Estate inventory

And finally, the estate inventory. In most counties the Register recorded the estate inventory in its own book. However, I have on occasion seen inventories recorded in Orphan’s Court books. While I believe that they are most often those of intestates, I can not vouch 100% that that is always the case.  It’s not a common occurrence, but if you’re looking anyway, you might get lucky.

So, there you have it. Five reasons why you might want to check out the Orphan’s Court records, even if your ancestor left a will.

Wordless Wednesday: Scheetz Family Farm Photos and Prints from the Library of Congress

Scheetz Farm in Fort Washington

The Scheetz family farm in Fort Washington

On 12 May 1786, Elizabeth Hocker, daughter of Johann Georg and Anna Margaretha Hacker, married General Henry Scheetz, son of Henry and Catharine Scheetz. Henry Scheetz served in the Revolutionary War (hence the title of General). He was in charge of a county brigade during the Fries Rebellion in 1798, but when the brigade arrived on site, the rebellion had already subsided. He later served in many prominent positions in local business and government.

His father inherited this property from his father—another Henry Scheetz. The family built a paper mill on Sandy Run in 1769 and later added a grist-mill. According to the Library of Congress, the “Scheetz family were prominent farmers, paper millers, public officials, and military veterans. The property achieved local prominence as the site of Scheetz paper mill, built in 1769 and destroyed in 1929.”

This image and others—including some of the house, barn, poultry shed, and garage—can be found on the Library of Congress’ website at “Scheetz Farm, 7161 Camp Hill Road, Fort Washington, Montgomery County, PA” and associated pages. Take a look and see what you can find for your family.

New Online Deed Viewer Lancaster County (PA) Recorder of Deeds Online E-Film Reader

The Lancaster County Recorder of Deeds has made available a new online deed e-film reader. Not only can you view the deeds online, but you can also search the deed indices by name.

You will be asked to login, but you can simply login as a guest by clicking a button. The e-film reader will open in a new window. To search the deed indices, click the “Infodex” link at the top of the screen. You can choose to search by grantor or grantee and enter a person’s name, last name first.

Lancaster County Online E-film reader index search

Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Online E-film Reader Index Search

Once you have a reference, you can click the “EFilm Reader” link. Enter the book—in this case “F3”—and click “Load Film.”

Online E-film reader deed book

Adam Nees to Frederick Hacker, Book F3:371

The page number will likely not exactly match the image number. As you can see from the image, page 371 is image 376. Usually, it’s close, but you may need to “scroll” a bit in order to find the deed you’re looking for, especially in books where you can’t actually read the page number.

I really like the new online e-film reader. It’s simple to use and doesn’t have the quirks the previous reader had regarding how to enter the book. Best of all—for me—the index and deed books are in one tool and it works on Chrome, Safari, and Firefox. No more switching to Firefox to look-up people in the deed index.

If you need to do land research in Lancaster County, try it out. I bet you’ll be doing the happy dance like me. 😉

A Learning Filled Friday

I spent Friday watching a number of webinars hosted by the Board for Certification of Genealogists which were broadcasted live. They were excellent! If you can, I recommend you visit Legacy Family Tree Webinars and watch. They are free—but only, I believe, for a limited time.

Elizabeth Shown Mills’ presentation was inspiring. She took a really, really, really tough brick wall—can you tell it was a really tough nut to crack?—and used a combination of the Genealogical Proof Standard (GPS), the FAN principle (researching friends, associates and neighbors), and DNA to take it from a logical, but unproven hypothesis to proven fact.1

I’m a big fan, ahem… of the FAN principle. I recently used it to identify the maiden name of one of the Hocker wives. This presentation showed me how to use DNA to prove the results FAN research provides. As in this case, it may be all you have when there is no other evidence. But it could also be used to make or bolster a case where limited evidence does exist or is contradictory.

All in all, a great way to spend a Friday afternoon and evening.

What’s a Collection?

I started this site in order to share my genealogy research. When I started I often wrote up my findings on a specific ancestor as a biography and published it as a blog post.

These posts helped me clarify my understanding and interpretation of the research and identify areas for further research. In one particular instance, they led me to understand that problems I was having with the timeline for one family meant my conclusions were incorrect.

But since a blog is ordered by date, these posts became difficult to find fairly quickly. It also became difficult to determine what I’d already written about. And since I couldn’t quickly locate a bio, it was hard to know  whether or not I needed to update a family’s information with new research I’d done.

When I redesigned the site, I decided to consolidate them in one area and to call it “collections.” A collection is basically… well, a collection of biographies associated with a particular family, surname, subject, or location. That’s it.

Take a look and see if I’ve covered something you’d be interested in. And if you have a suggestion of what—or who—you’d like to see covered, drop me a line and let me know.

Shaking Those Little Leafs What I've Learned Using Ancestry's Family Trees

I recently decided to have my DNA tested at Ancestry. Since you really can’t get anything worthwhile out of it without being able to compare family trees with your match, I decided to go ahead build a tree at Ancestry.

While testing my DNA was the main driver, I was also hoping to get help finding records for some of those ancestors that I haven’t done much research on. By the time you get more than a couple of generations back, there are so many ancestors to research, it’s hard to keep up. A little assistance would be appreciated.

Ancestry HintsAnd for some ancestors, this is what has happened. Ancestry’s shaking leafs have shown me records that I don’t have. And helped me learn more about them. For the most part, however, it’s shown me records that I already have or would have easily located by doing a basic search for that ancestor.

It’s also mostly showing me records after I’ve entered information about my ancestor. Dates, places, relatives. The point when you really need help, however, is when you really don’t know that stuff.

For instance, I’ve seen no hints for baptismal records appear for an ancestor until after I’ve entered the parents names. When you don’t know the parents’ names, that’s when you need the most help, right? So, the shaky leaves are good at finding records mostly for what I already know? Where’s the help in that?

The second thing I’ve learned is that it is so easy to be overwhelmed by hints. Some are good matches, but a lot aren’t. German clues are kinda useless when I only have the US plan. And do I really need to go through the ten copies of the same gravestone image that other people have attached to this ancestor? Especially, if the image was originally from this site! (Yeah, that’s happened.)

Perhaps I’d be more enamored with the shaking leafs if I were just beginning. If I were just starting my tree with only knowledge of my parents and grandparents, I think it would be much more useful. Recent census records alone would help to identify prior generations. But my holes are in the early 1800s and 1700s. Records for those periods are 1) less likely to be online and 2) harder to find due to spelling inconsistencies for almost any given surname.

Maybe I should’ve known better. I’ve been at this long enough to know it’s not as easy as the Ancestry commercials make it look.

Wish list

If I could create a wishlist for Ancestry’s hints, I’d really like the ability to specify the types of hints I’d like to see. I can limit my search to only historical records. Why can’t I set preferences for my tree to do the same with hints? After all, it’s performing the same function and I can already filter the hints after the fact. Why can’t I do it before the search is performed?

It would also be kinda cool to be able to limit the hints to family lines, only direct ancestors, etc. I understand the value of researching collateral lines; I do it all the time myself.  But do I really want to see hints for my first cousin 4x removed’s husband’s parents? When what I really want to know is who are the parents of my 4x great grandfather? Not so much.

Tuesday Tip: Beware Indexing Errors Ancestry's Index of Early Emanuel Lutheran Baptismal Records

I’ve been using the Pennsylvania and New Jersey, Church and Town Records, 1708-1985 to locate records for my ancestors. I keep running into the same error in the index for some of these records—specifically the early baptismal records for Emanuel Evangelical Lutheran Church, also known as the Warwick Congregation in the 18th century.

Here’s an example from my Hacker family:

Adam Hacker family baptisms

 

At the top of the page, you have “Joann Adam Hacker,” the name of the head of the family. Beneath his name is a list of his children that were baptized at the Warwick congregation, their birthdates, and for two of the children, their baptismal dates, as well.

The problem with these entries is found in the way they are indexed. Each of these children were indexed on Ancestry using the surname of their sponsor. For instance, Fridrich was indexed as “Fridrich Weidman” with “Wendel Wiedman” listed as his father. This is incorrect. I’ve added the correct surnames to the entries, but their baptisms do not show up in search results using the correct surname.

Fridrich Hacker index entry

I don’t know if other records in the collection have this issue; it depends, I would guess, on the format used in the original source. Early records from the Warwick congregation listed baptisms with the children grouped and listed under their father’s name. For some reason the indexers did not understand this format—or that a sponsor, as listed, was not the parent.

This problem is not just limited to my family, but to all baptisms at Emanuel Lutheran through about 1772. The last entry that used this format was that of Susannah, daughter of Henrich Dieterich and his wife Christina. She is listed in the index as “Susannah Süss.”

This is another example of why it’s so important to not stop at the index. If a record should be there, make sure you page through the images before you give up. You might be thrilled by what you find.

Friday Find: Cumberland County Deed Indices Doing the Genealogy Happy Dance

I went looking to rent some films from FamilySearch for some research I’m doing. I discovered that images from the very films I need are available online!

cumberland deeds index

Each of those camera icons indicate that that particular microfilm is available for online viewing.

Although the images aren’t indexed, they’re no more difficult to use than the microfilm would be. And, oh, it’s so much more convenient to be able to instantly use them at home!

Happy happy, joy joy joy.

Easy Footnotes Adding Footnotes to Your WordPress Blog Post

I’ve written before about the importance of citing your sources. But when you’re writing a blog post creating footnotes can be a bit of a problem. If you’re posting to a self-hosted WordPress blog, however, there is a simple solution.

When I first started writing my blog, I created my footnotes the hard way—inserting the HTML markup into the text for the footnote, then adding a section at the very end of the post and inserting the citations there.

blah blah blah.<sup>1</sup> Blah blah blah

This was awkward and time consuming.

Plugins

There are a number of plugins listed on WordPress.org for adding footnotes to posts or pages. Most of the ones I looked at required the use of shortcodes. A citation would be formatted like this:

[shortcode]This is the citation content.[/shortcode]

Each plugin had it’s own shortcode. Various plugins used [ref], [footnote], <fn>, etc.

This works. But again it’s awkward, especially if you’re not writing your post directly in the post editor.

FD Footnotes does not work that way. For this plugin you add your citation much like you’re adding an inline footnote. So, the citation would look like this in your text:

blah blah blah.[1.This is your footnote.] Blah blah blah.

The plugin automatically numbers and formats the footnote marker and places the footnote at the end of the post or page.1

This works well for me. I write my posts in Scrivener, adding my footnotes as inline citations.2 Then I copy the blog text and paste it into the WordPress editor. When you view the post, the citations have been converted to footnotes that you can click to view the full note.

With a little extra effort, I can later turn the blog post footnotes into Scrivener footnotes. This means I can easily reuse post content in a printed or electronic book I want to publish.

There’s really only one thing I don’t like about this process. It’s difficult for me to read/review the post one last time in the editor. I have to preview the post so that the plugin executes. Otherwise the inline footnotes interfere with my ability to easily read the text.

If you’re writing for a self-hosted WordPress blog and need footnotes, try out the FD Footnotes plugin and see if it fits your writing process.